1. Introduction
In recent years, the role of intestinal flora in the therapeutic mechanisms of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been of broad and current interest,[1] and the involvement of intestinal flora in glucose-lowering effects in therapeutic regimens such as diet control, exercise therapy, weight loss surgery, and glucose-lowering drugs has been suggested.[2] The mechanisms of intestinal flora in the treatment of T2DM have not been fully elucidated, but currently recognized mechanisms of occurrence include the short-chain fatty acid theory, the bile acid theory, and the endotoxin inflammation theory.[3]
Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are a class of medications known as themost widely used drugs for the treatment of T2DM because of their cardiovascular and metabolic benefits, such as improved cardiac capacity and significant weight loss.[4] These medications include metformin, which is still regarded as first-line therapy for treating T2DM. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) are incretin-based drugs that act primarily in the human intestine to lower blood glucose by stimulating insulin secretion and lowering glucagon secretion.[3] Kato et al[5] found that after 16 hours of use of GLP-1 RAs, gut flora in patients was significantly altered at the phylum level, with a significant reduction in phylum Bacteroidetes and a trend towards an increase inphylum Actinobacteria. At the genus level, there was a significant decrease in the abundance of Ruminococcus. In addition, a recent study found significant differences in the beta diversity of gut flora between patients with good glycemic control using and those without using GLP-1 RAs, where the abundance of probiotics such as Alfalfa spp. and Butyricoccus spp. were positively correlated with glycemic reduction. These probiotics likely have a positive role in the treatment of T2DM with GLP-1 RAs.[6] Currently, this is the only clinical study we are aware of that reports on GLP-1 RAs and their effect on the intestinal flora. Beyond that, we are not aware of any studies related to the use of GLP-1 RAs and probiotic abundances.
The research conducted in this paper is focused on the effect of GLP-1 RAs on 2 types of bacteria present in the intestinal flora, Lactobacillus delbrueckii (L delbrueckii) and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (F prausnitzii). In current studies on the intestinal flora, Lactobacillus spp. has been regarded as one of the most vital probiotics, and the abundance of Lactobacillus is often a focus topic for probiotic research.[7]L delbrueckii, as a representative species of Lactobacillus spp., has significant probiotic properties, including anti-inflammatory effects in gastrointestinal tract disease treatment and pathogen inhibition.[8]L delbrueckii is a gram-positive rod-shaped homofermentive lactic acid bacteria that is involved in the production of dairy products such as cheese and yogurt and produces acetaldehyde, the main flavor component in yogurt.[9] On the other hand F prausnitzii, as the only species currently identifiedin the Faecalibacterium genus in the gut, is considered a crucial probiotic for measuring the health of the intestinal flora.[10]F prausnitzii is a butyrate-producing bacterium that has been found at about 5% to 10% in abundance in the intestinal flora of healthy adults, and is one of the most abundant species in the known intestinal flora.[11]
In this study, Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) was used to observe changes in blood glucose, body mass index (BMI), and abundance of L delbrueckii and F prausnitzii in the guts of human adult patients before and after the use of GLP-1 RAs to analyze the effect of GLP-1 RAs on these 2 bacteria in the intestinal flora. This study also aims to clarify whether changes in blood glucose and BMI following treatment with GLP-1 RAs for T2DM are related to the abundance of F prausnitzii and L delbrueckii in the human gut.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Participants
We recruited subjects that were newly diagnosed with T2DM at the outpatient clinic of the Department of Endocrinology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University. They were enrolled in the study by signing an informed consent form for a 1 week trial after meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study was conducted in strict accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the 4 Principles of Ethics, and all subjects provided informed consent. The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2200063198) and ethical review approval was obtained from the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (approval number: 2022L79).
Inclusion criteria: patients with a clinically new diagnosis of T2DM; agreement to participate in this study and signed an informed consent form after being informed of the study.
Exclusion criteria: acute and chronic diseases of the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and nervous systems that may affect gut flora; intake of antibiotics, glucocorticoids, and other medications that may affect gut flora within the last 3 months; women who are nursing or pregnant; prior long history of smoking and alcohol consumption.
2.2. Stool collection
Before the start of the test, subjects were asked to collect 2g of fasting stool in a sterile tube in the early morning. The samples were immediately sent to the laboratory for cell morphological fixation. Subjects were then administered with GLP-1 RAs for a duration of 1 week under observation and monitoring of the subjects general condition. Meals were provided uniformly to all subjects during the trial and were guaranteed to be consistent by the hospital’s nutritional dining room, in order to reduce the effect of diet on the trial. After 1 week of GLP-1 agonist administration, early morning fasting stools were again collected from the subjects and sent to the laboratory for cell fixation.
2.3. Blood collection
Immediately following collection of patients’ stool samples in the early morning, 10 mL of fasting venous blood was drawn from the subject in a sterile tube and sent to the laboratory for storage at −80ºC in the refrigerator both before and after administration of GLP-1 RAs for 1 week.
2.4. Measurement of BMI
BMI = Weight/ Height2 (kg/m2) was measured by the researcher after the subjects removed their shoes, hats and coats both before and after administration of GLP-1 RAs for 1 week.
2.5. Stool sample pretreatment
The collected stool samples needed to be sent to the laboratory within 1 hour for preprocessing to prevent bacterial death due to environmental factors and to limit changes in cell morphology. The samples were fixed with 4% Paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 3 hours, then centrifuged. The sediment was rinsed 3 times with sterile water, then suspended in 50% alcohol and stored at −20°C.
2.6. Fluorescence in situ hybridization
Specific oligonucleotide probes Lbd (5’- AAG GAT AGC ATG TCT GCA -3’) and FPR-1 (5’- GTC GAA CGA GCG AGA GAG GAG CTT GCT TTC TCA AGC GAG T -3’) labeled with fluorochrome CY3 were selected and FISH was performed according to the procedure described by Kong et al.[12] Samples were mixed with CY3 probes in 0% formamide hybridization solution for 3 hours at 46°C and protected from light, followed by elution of the hybridization solution in eluent and staining of total bacteria of the samples using 4’,6-diamino-2-phenylindole anti (DAPI, Beijing Lanjike Technology Co., Ltd.).
2.7. Microscopic observation and cell counting
Each sample was observed microscopically using a fluorescence microscopic imaging analysis system DP72 (Olympus Corporation, Japan) and photographed using celsens software. Images of Cy3 and DAPI staining in the same field of view were taken as 1 group. To reduce errors, at least 10 sets of images for each sample were taken. Cell counts were performed for each set of images using ImageJ software. Bacterial abundance per group was calculated as the number of Cy3-stained cells/number of DAPI-stained cells, and the final bacterial abundance for each sample was taken as the median of the 10 groups. The 2 researchers counted the bacteria in the samples, averaged them when they were close to each other, and recalculated them when they were much different.
2.8. Measurement of blood glucose
The blood glucose content of the subjects was measured using a glucose oxidase assay kit (Shanghai Bioengineering Co., Ltd.).
2.9. Statistical analysis
The data was processed using SPSS 19.0 statistical software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Measurement data conforming to normal distribution were expressed as (X ± S), and the t test was used to compare 2 groups; the measurement data with non-normal distribution were expressed as M (P25, P75), and the Wilcoxon test was used to compare 2 groups; correlation analysis was performed by Spearman coefficient test, and P < .05 was considered a statistically significant difference.
3. Results
3.1. Subject information
When analyzing results from the second stool sample from subjects following GLP-1 RA administration for 1 week, it should be noted that some of the subjects had taken antibiotics or other medications that might affect the intestinal flora during the study period because subjects were already hospitalized and needed to complete relevant tests. Some subjects were diagnosed with inflammation, and acute or chronic diseases. Some subjects even underwent gastroscopy during the study period, which may have affected the outcome of the gut flora, as a result, these subjects had to be terminated (Fig. 1). Following these terminations, a total of twelve subjects were ultimately included in the study, consisting of 6 males and 6 females, with an age range of 54.25 ± 13.18.
3.2. Changes in the abundance of L delbrueckii and F prausnitzii before and after the use of GLP-1 RAs
We observed the changes in the abundance of L delbrueckii and F prausnitzii before and after the use of GLP-1 RA by using the FISH technique (Figs. 2 and 3).
Figure 2A shows L delbrueckii labeled with Lbd probe before the use of GLP-1 RA, and Figure 2B shows all bacteria corresponding to Figure 2A labeled with DAPI staining. Figure 2C shows L delbrueckii labeled with the Lbd probe after the use of the GLP-1 RA, and Figure 2D shows all bacteria corresponding to Figure 2C labeled with the DAPI stain.
Figure 3A shows F prausnitzii labeled with the FPR-1 probe before the use of GLP-1 RAs; Figure 3B shows all bacteria tagged with the DAPI stain in the same field of view corresponding to Figure 3A. Figure 3C shows F prausnitzii labeled with the FPR-1 probe after application of the GLP-1 RA, and Figure 3D shows all bacteria labeled with DAPI staining in the same field of view corresponding to Figure 3C for all bacteria.
We found that L delbrueckii abundance was 7.71 (3.74, 9.39) before the use of GLP-1 RA and 6.67 (5.43, 8.43) after the use of GLP-1 RA The Wilcoxon rank sum test analysis showed no statistically significant difference in bacterial abundance before and after GLP-1 RA administration in L delbrueckii (P = .695) (Fig. 4A). On the other hand F prausnitzii abundance was 4.24 (0.81, 6.97) before and 9.98 (7.65, 14.88) after the use of GLP-1 RA. The Wilcoxon rank sum test analysis showed a significant difference in bacterial abundance before and after administration of GLP-1 RA in F prausnitzii (P = .002) (Fig. 4B).
3.3. Changes in blood glucose and BMI index
We found that patient’s fasting blood glucose significantly decreased after 1 week of GLP-1 RA administration (P < .001) (Fig. 4C); in addition, patients BMI also significantly decreased after 1 week of GLP-1 RA administration (P = .005) (Fig. 4D).
3.4. Correlation analysis
We used Spearman correlation analysis to explore whether the abundance of L delbrueckii and F prausnitzii in the gut is correlated with blood glucose levels and BMI when using GLP-1 RAs to treat T2DM. The results showed that fasting blood glucose was not significantly correlated with the abundance of L delbrueckii in the gut (R = −0.098, P = .647) (Fig. 5A); however, it was negatively correlated with the abundance of F prausnitzii (R = −0.689, P < .001) (Fig. 5C). In contrast, there was no significant correlation (R = 0.134, P = .534) between BMI and both L delbrueckii abundance (Fig. 5B) and F prausnitzii abundance (Fig. 5D) in the gut following administration of GLP-1 RAs (R = −0.056, P = .796).
4. Discussion
FISH is a molecular biology technique often used for the identification and enumeration of intestinal microorganisms directly under a fluorescent microscope by hybridization of fluorescent dye-impregnated oligonucleotide probes with cells that have been pretreated in advance.[13] In the past, it has mostly been used for the study of environmental microorganisms and gut microbes[14,15]; in recent years, the usage of FISH has gradually expanded and can be applied to the screening of tumor cells in clinical settings[16] and the examination of genetic chromosomes.[17] FISH allows for the design of oligonucleotide probes specific for different bacteria with higher specificity than the primers used in 16 seconds rRNA and macroeconomic PCR amplification of target fragments. It also has a higher accuracy in detecting the abundance of individual bacteria.[18,19]
In this study, stool samples from subjects recently diagnosed with T2DM were examined by FISH before and after a 1 week duration of GLP-1 agonist administration. F prausnitzii was found to be significantly more abundant in the human gut after the use of GLP-1 RAs, while L delbrueckii showed no significant differences before and after GLP-1 RA administration. We also validated the glucose-lowering and weight loss capabilities of GLP-1 RAs. We found that following usage of a GLP-1 RA, a patient’s fasting glucose can drop to ideal levels. Regarding weight loss, patients who were administered GLP-1 RAs had an average BMI reduction of 0.64 kg/m2, which was statistically significant.
F prausnitzii is a butyrate-producing bacterium with a well-known anti-inflammatory potential in the host.[20] Butyrate provides about 10% of the host’s daily energy requirements, protects against pathogenic invasion, modulates the immune system, and inhibits the progression of autoimmune diabetes.[21] Moderate levels of butyrate can also contribute to the treatment of T2DM by improving high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance through epigenetic regulation and mitochondrial β-oxidation.[22] Studies have pointed out that high levels of butyric acid can stimulate GLP-1 secretion, enhance insulin sensitivity through the cAMP signaling pathway, and inhibit gastric emptying in humans.[23]This mechanism of action is similar to that of GLP-1 RAs.
Moreover, F prausnitzii can promote bile acid levels in vivo,[24] maintain intestinal barrier function and improve intestinal inflammatory status by regulating energy metabolism.[25] Bile acids can also regulate the secretion of intestinal hormones such as GLP-1 and PYY in the body, acting in the same way as short-chain fatty acids such as butyrate, which in turn affect appetite and energy intake and directly regulate blood glucose levels in diabetic patients.[26]
In addition to improving the intestinal inflammatory response in diabetes through indirect factors such as short-chain fatty acids and bile acids, F prausnitzii can also directly secrete microbial anti-inflammatory molecules to stabilize intestinal epithelial cell permeability and restore intestinal barrier structure and function in diabetic conditions by regulating intestinal epithelial tight junction pathways and ZO-1 expression.[18] Arguably, F prausnitzii affects the treatment of T2DM through 3 main mechanisms of action: the short-chain fatty acid theory, the bile acid theory, and the endotoxin inflammation theory.
One study found that F prausnitzii abundance in the intestine of diabetic and obese patients was significantly decreased and negatively correlated with glycated hemoglobin HbA1c values.[27] In contrast, in our study, we found a significant negative correlation between fasting glucose and F.prausnitzii abundance in the gut of patients treated with GLP-1 RAs, but no significant correlation between BMI and F prausnitzii abundance. We suggest that while F prausnitzii may be one of the pathways of glucose regulation in the treatment of T2DM with GLP-1 RAs, the weight loss effects of GLP-1 RAs are not directly related to F prausnitzii.
Notably, a recent study found that L delbrueckii improved fasting glucose, fetuin-a, and Sestrin-3 levels in type 2 diabetic mice.[28] Fetuin-a and Sestrin-3, 2 circulating proteins in the organism that play a vital role in the process of insulin resistance,[29,30] are good targets for the regulation of insulin sensitivity.[28] In addition, another META analysis also indicated that L delbrueckii could reduce fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and insulin levels in patients with T2DM.[31] However, our study found no significant change in L delbrueckii abundance after treatment with GLP-1 RAs and no significant correlation with fasting glucose levels and BMI. This suggests that L delbrueckii is not involved in the hypoglycemic and weight loss effects of GLP-1 RAs used in the treatment of T2DM, and that GLP-1 RAs have no direct effect on L delbrueckii abundance in the gut.
As there are few clinical studies of gut flora, this study is the first in which we explore the relationship between the hypoglycemic effects of GLP-1 RAs and gut flora. Due to the many factors affecting gut flora, strict control of inclusion and exclusion criteria would result in insufficient sample sizes, making it difficult to collect valid sample sizes. Later, due to the liberalization of the control of the novel coronavirus epidemic, most people were infected with the virus. To prevent the effects of novel coronavirus on the gut flora, we ultimately had no choice but to terminate the trial, with only 12 samples meeting the criteria to be included in the final study.
Since this study was an initial exploratory study, despite the small sample size, our results suggest that the variability in the abundance of F prausnitzii with the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists is significant. We believe this is sufficient to provide a theoretical basis for our later in-depth exploration of the mechanism of action of the gut flora in GLP-1 RAs.
5. Conclusion
F prausnitzii is considered a marker of intestinal health, and its abundance has been strongly associated with the development of T2DM and obesity. In this study, we examined the changes in intestinal flora in patients with T2DM before and after the use of GLP-1 RA by FISH and found that the abundance of F prausnitzii in the intestine increased significantly after 1 week of treatment with GLP-1 RA for T2DM. F prausnitzii also showed a significant negative correlation with fasting glucose of patients, which suggests that F prausnitzii may be one of the pathways through which GLP-1 RAs regulate blood glucose.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: Lei Liang, Xiaoyun Su.
Data curation: Elizabeth Rao.
Formal analysis: Lin Chen, Rong Nie.
Funding acquisition: Xin Nian.
Methodology: Lei Liang, Xin Nian.
Project administration: Xuxiang Zhang, Xin Nian.
Resources: Xin Nian.
Software: Elizabeth Rao, Xuxiang Zhang, Bin Wu, Xin Nian.
Supervision: Bin Wu, Xin Nian.
Writing – original draft: Lei Liang.
Writing – review & editing: Lei Liang.
Abbreviations:
- FISH
- fluorescence in situ hybridization
- F prausnitzii =
- Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
- GLP-1
- glucagon-like peptide 1
- GLP-1 RA
- GLP-1 receptor agonist
- L delbrueckii =
- Lactobacillus delbrueckii
- T2DM
- type 2 diabetes mellitus
References
[1]. Gurung M, Li Z, You H, et al. Role of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes pathophysiology. EBioMedicine. 2020;51:102590.
- Cited Here |
- Google Scholar
[2]. Akash MSH, Fiayyaz F, Rehman K, et al. Gut microbiota and metabolic disorders: advances in therapeutic interventions. Crit Rev Immunol. 2019;39:223–37.
- Cited Here |
- PubMed | CrossRef |
- Google Scholar
[3]. Quast DR, Nauck MA, Schenker N, et al. Macronutrient intake, appetite, food preferences and exocrine pancreas function after treatment with short- and long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23:2344–53.
- Cited Here |
- View Full Text | PubMed | CrossRef |
- Google Scholar
[4]. Buse JB, Wexler DJ, Tapas A, et al. 2019 update to: management of hyperglycemia in type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2020;43:487–93.
- Cited Here |
- View Full Text | PubMed | CrossRef |
- Google Scholar
[5]. Kato S, Sato T, Fujita H, et al. Effects of GLP-1 receptor agonist on changes in the gut bacterium and the underlying mechanisms. Sci Rep. 2021;11:9167.
- Cited Here |
- PubMed |
- Google Scholar
[6]. Tsai CY, Lu HC, Chou YH, et al. Gut microbial signatures for glycemic responses of GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetic patients: a pilot study. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:814770.
- Cited Here |
- Google Scholar
[7]. Azad MAK, Sarker M, Li T, et al. Probiotic species in the modulation of gut microbiota: an overview. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:9478630.
- Cited Here |
- Google Scholar
[8]. Nikolaou A, Saxami G, Kourkoutas Y, et al. A new methodology for rapid detection of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus based on multiplex PCR. J Microbiol Methods. 2011;84:362–4.
- Cited Here |
- Google Scholar
[9]. Zanni E, Schifano E, Motta S, et al. combination of metabolomic and proteomic analysis revealed different features among Lactobacillus delbrueckii Subspecies bulgaricus and lactis strains while in vivo testing in the model organism caenorhabditis elegans highlighted probiotic properties. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1206.
- Cited Here |
- Google Scholar
[10]. Leylabadlo HE, Sanaie S, Heravi FS, et al. From role of gut microbiota to microbial-based therapies in type 2-diabetes. Infect Genet Evol. 2020;81:104268.
- Cited Here |
- PubMed | CrossRef |
- Google Scholar
[11]. Cao Y, Shen J, Ran ZH. Association between Faecalibacterium prausnitzii reduction and inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:872725.
- Cited Here |
- Google Scholar
[12]. Kong Y, He M, McAlister T, et al. Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization of microbial communities in the rumens of cattle fed different diets. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:6933–8.
- Cited Here |
- PubMed | CrossRef |
- Google Scholar
[13]. Wagner M, Horn M, Daims H. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation for the identification and characterisation of prokaryotes. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003;6:302–9.
- Cited Here |
- PubMed | CrossRef |
- Google Scholar
[14]. Kuo JT, Chang LL, Yen CY, et al. Development of fluorescence in situ hybridization as a rapid, accurate method for detecting coliforms in water samples. Biosensors (Basel). 2020;11:8.
- Cited Here |
- Google Scholar
[15]. Sokol H, Seksik P, Rigottier-Gois L, et al. Specificities of the fecal microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:106–11.
- Cited Here |
- View Full Text | PubMed | CrossRef |
- Google Scholar
[16]. Chrzanowska NM, Kowalewski J, Lewandowska MA. Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in diagnosis and tailored therapies in solid tumors. Molecules. 2020;25:1864.
- Cited Here |
- PubMed | CrossRef |
- Google Scholar
[17]. Freitag CE, Sukov WR, Bryce AH, et al. Assessment of isochromosome 12p and 12p abnormalities in germ cell tumors using fluorescence in situ hybridization, single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays, and next-generation sequencing/mate-pair sequencing. Hum Pathol. 2021;112:20–34.
- Cited Here |
- PubMed | CrossRef |
- Google Scholar
[18]. Abellan-schneyder I, Matchado MS, Reitmeier S, et al. Primer, pipelines, parameters: issues in 16S rRNA gene sequencing. mSphere. 2021;6:e01202–20.
- Cited Here |
- Google Scholar
[19]. Wright ES, Yilmaz LS, Corcoran AM, et al. Automated design of probes for rRNA-targeted fluorescence in situ hybridization reveals the advantages of using dual probes for accurate identification. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:5124–33.
- Cited Here |
- PubMed | CrossRef |
- Google Scholar
[20]. Xu J, Liang R, Zhang W, et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii-derived microbial anti-inflammatory molecule regulates intestinal integrity in diabetes mellitus mice via modulating tight junction protein expression. J Diabetes. 2020;12:224–36.
- Cited Here |
- Google Scholar
[21]. Thorburn AN, Macia L, Mackay CR. Diet metabolites, and “western-lifestyle” inflammatory diseases. Immunity. 2014;40:833–42.
- Cited Here |
- View Full Text | PubMed | CrossRef |
- Google Scholar
[22]. Lu Y, Fan C, Liang A, et al. Effects of SCFA on the DNA methylation pattern of adiponectin and resistin in high-fat-diet-induced obese male mice. Br J Nutr. 2018;120:385–92.
- Cited Here |
- View Full Text | PubMed | CrossRef |
- Google Scholar
[23]. Gomes AC, Hoffmann C, Mota JF. The human gut microbiota: metabolism and perspective in obesity. Gut Microbes. 2018;9:308–25.
- Cited Here |
- Google Scholar
[24]. Wang Y, Gao X, Zhang X, et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis is associated with altered bile acid metabolism in infantile cholestasis. mSystems. 2019;4:e00463–19.
- Cited Here |
- Google Scholar
[25]. Chiang JYL, Ferrell JM. Bile acid receptors FXR and TGR5 signaling in fatty liver diseases and therapy. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2020;318:G554–73.
- Cited Here |
- PubMed | CrossRef |
- Google Scholar
[26]. Calderon G, McRae A, Rievaj J, et al. Ileo-colonic delivery of conjugated bile acids improves glucose homeostasis via colonic GLP-1-producing enteroendocrine cells in human obesity and diabetes. EBioMedicine. 2020;55:102759.
- Cited Here |
- Google Scholar
[27]. Hippe B, Remely M, Aumueller E, et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii phylotypes in type two diabetic, obese, and lean control subjects. Benef Microbes. 2016;7:511–7.
- Cited Here |
- PubMed |
- Google Scholar
[28]. Hallajzadeh J, Eslami RD, Tanomand A. Effect of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis PTCC1057 on serum glucose, fetuin-A, and sestrin 3 levels in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2021;13:383–9.
- Cited Here |
- Google Scholar
[29]. Fatima F, Ahsan N, Nasim A, et al. Association of fetuin-A with dyslipidemia and insulin resistance in type-II diabetics of Pakistani population. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36:64–8.
- Cited Here |
- PubMed |
- Google Scholar
[30]. Tao R, Xiong X, Liangpunsakul S, et al. Sestrin 3 protein enhances hepatic insulin sensitivity by direct activation of the mTORC2-Akt signaling. Diabetes. 2015;64:1211–23.
- Cited Here |
- View Full Text | PubMed | CrossRef |
- Google Scholar
[31]. Koutnikova H, Genser B, Monteiro-Sepulveda M, et al. Impact of bacterial probiotics on obesity, diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease related variables: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e017995.
- Cited Here |
- Google Scholar
Keywords:
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii; GLP-1 receptor agonist; intestinal flora; Lactobacillus delbrueckii; type 2 diabetes